Danemark

Membre depius 1991

Depuis l'évaluation de 2017 des mesures prises par le Danemark pour lutter contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme, et ses rapports de suivi de 2018 et 2019, le pays a pris un certain nombre de mesures pour renforcer son cadre.

Le Danemark s'est engagé dans un processus de suivi renforcé suite à l'adoption de son évaluation mutuelle en 2017. Conformément aux procédures du GAFI relatives aux évaluations mutuelles, le pays a informé le GAFI des mesures prises depuis son dernier rapport de suivi, en novembre 2019.

Aujourd'hui, le Danemark est conforme sur 6 des 40 Recommandations et largement conforme sur 32 d'entre elles. Il reste partiellement conforme sur 2 recommandations.

Les progrès de Danemark dans le renforcement des mesures de lutte contre le blanchiment d’argent et le financement du terrorisme

16 févr. 2021

Le présent rapport de suivi analyse les progrès réalisés par le Danemark pour remédier aux manquements en matière de conformité technique identifiés dans son évaluation mutuelle de 2017 et dans les rapports de suivi 2018 et 2019 qui ont suivi.

En savoir plus Rapport de suivi 2019 Rapport de suivi 2018

En 2017, le GAFI a évalué l'efficacité des mesures prises par le Danemark pour lutter contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme, ainsi que leur conformité avec la recommandation du GAFI. Le rapport a conclu que le Danemark ne dispose pas d'une stratégie nationale de lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme et doit faire davantage pour évaluer et comprendre correctement les risques auxquels il est exposé. Le rapport recommande également que le Danemark promulgue une infraction indépendante et moderne de blanchiment de capitaux qui criminalise l'auto-blanchiment .

Le Danemark a démontré son engagement à renforcer son régime de détection, de prévention et de répression du blanchiment de capitaux et du financement du terrorisme et à protéger l'intégrité du système financier, notamment par des amendements législatifs récents qui n'ont pas pu être examinés dans le cadre de l'évaluation. 

Chef de la délégation

Principal(e) Ministère/Autorité représenté(e) au sein de la Délegation auprès du GAFI

Ministry of Finance

Ministry of Industry, Business & Financial Affairs

Head of delegation

Autres Ministères/Autorités

Ministry of Justice

Denmark's official website 

 

Notations

Conformité technique

Danemark Rapport de suivi - 2021

R.1 - Assessing risk & applying risk-based approach
LC
R.2 - National cooperation and coordination
LC
R.3 - Money laundering offence
LC
R.4 - Confiscation and provisional measures
LC
R.5 - Terrorist financing offence
C
R.6 - Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism & terrorist financing
LC
R.7 - Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation
LC
R.8 - Non-profit organisations
LC
R.9 - Financial institution secrecy laws
LC
R.10 - Customer due diligence
LC
R.11 - Record keeping
LC
R.12 - Politically exposed persons
C
R.13 - Correspondent banking
PC
R.14 - Money or value transfer services
LC
R.15 - New technologies
PC
R.16 - Wire transfers
LC
R.17 - Reliance on third parties
LC
R.18 - Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries
LC
R.19 - Higher-risk countries
LC
R.20 - Reporting of suspicious transactions
C
R.21 - Tipping-off and confidentiality
C
R.22 - DNFBPs: Customer due diligence
LC
R.23 - DNFBPs: Other measures
LC
R.24 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons
LC
R.25 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements
LC
R.26 - Regulation and supervision of financial institutions
LC
R.27 - Powers of supervisors
LC
R.28 - Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs
LC
R.29 - Financial intelligence units
LC
R.30 - Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities
C
R.31 - Powers of law enforcement and investigative authorities
LC
R.32 - Cash couriers
LC
R.33 - Statistics
LC
R.34 - Guidance and feedback
C
R.35- Sanctions
LC
R.36 - International instruments
LC
R.37 - Mutual legal assistance
LC
R.38 - Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation
LC
R.39 - Extradition
LC
R.40 - Other forms of international cooperation
LC
  • C = conforme (compliant)
  • LC = en grande partie conforme (largely compliant)
  • PC = partiellement conforme (partially compliant)
  • NC = non conforme (non-compliant)

Efficacité

Danemark Rapport de suivi - 2021

IO1
ME
IO2
SE
IO3
LE
IO4
LE
IO5
ME
IO6
ME
IO7
ME
IO8
ME
IO9
SE
IO10
ME
IO11
SE
  • HE = niveau d'efficacité élevé (high level of effectiveness)
  • SE = niveau d'efficacité significatif (substantial level of effectiveness) 
  • ME = niveau d'efficacité modéré (moderate level of effectiveness)
  • LE = niveau d'efficacité faible (low level of effectiveness)

Publications connexes

  • 16 févr. 2021

    Denmark's progress in strengthening measures to tackle money laundering and terrorist financing This follow-up report analyses Denmark's progress in addressing the technical compliance deficiencies identified in its 2017 Mutual Evaluation and ensuing 2018 and 2019 Follow-Up Reports.

  • 14 nov. 2019

    Denmark’s progress in strengthening measures to tackle money laundering and terrorist financing This follow report analyses Denmark's progress in addressing the technical compliance deficiencies identified in its 2017 Mutual Evaluation.

  • 21 nov. 2018

    Denmark’s progress in strengthening measures to tackle money laundering and terrorist financing This report analyses Denmark's progress in addressing the technical compliance deficiencies identified in the 2017 FATF assessment of the country's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. The report also looks at whether Denmark has implemented new measures to meet the requirements of FATF Recommendations that changed since the 2017 mutual evaluation.

  • 19 oct. 2018

    Outcomes FATF Plenary, 17-19 October 2018 Under the Presidency of Mr. Billingslea of the United States, delegates discussed among other issues: combating the financing of terrorism, the Mutual Evaluation of Israel and the United Kingdom, regulation of virtual assets.

  • 7 août 2017

    Denmark’s measures to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation Denmark has the foundations for a sound regime to tackle money laundering and terrorist financing, but needs to improve the implementation of measures to mitigate the risks, including through better assessing those risks and enhancing national policy coordination.

  • 23 juin 2017

    Outcomes of the Plenary meeting of the FATF, Valencia, 21-23 June 2017 Under the Spanish Presidency of Mr. Vega-Serrano, delegates discussed the global response to terrorist financing, improving transparency and beneficial ownership, and the mutual evaluation reports of Denmark and Ireland, and issued a statement on Brazil.

  • 25 juin 2011

    Outcomes of the FATF Plenary meeting, Amsterdam, 23-25 June 2010 The Chairman's summary provides an overview of the major outcomes of the Plenary, during which India became a full member of the FATF and the mutual evaluations of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, India and Brazil were approved.

  • 22 oct. 2010

    Outcomes of the FATF Plenary meeting, Paris, 20-22 October 2010 The Chairman's summary provides an overview of the major outcomes of the meeting of the FATF Plenary, during which the mutual evaluation of Argentina was approved, as well as follow-up reports of the Kingdom of Denmark, Spain and Sweden. The FATF Plenary also provided an update on AML/CFT improvements in Qatar and Azerbaijan

  • 22 oct. 2010

    Follow-up Report to the Mutual Evaluation of Denmark This follow-up report provides an overview of the main changes made to the AML/CFT system in the Kingdom of Denmark since the adoption of their mutual evaluation report in June 2006. In October 2010, the FATF recognised that the Kingdom of Denmark had made significant progress in addressing deficiencies identified in their mutual evaluation report and decided that the country should be removed from the regular follow-up process.

  • 22 sept. 2006

    Mutual Evaluation of Denmark The report describes and analyses the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT laws, regulations and other measures that have been put in place by Denmark. This assessment is based on the 40+9 Recommendations and ratings of compliance have been made according to the four levels of compliance mentioned in the 2004 Methodology.