Democratic People's Republic of Korea

Related publications

  • 24 Feb 2023

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 24 February 2023 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 21 Oct 2022

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 21 October 2022 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 17 Jun 2022

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - June 2022 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 3 Mar 2022

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - March 2022 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 21 Oct 2021

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - October 2021 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 25 Jun 2021

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - June 2021 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 25 Feb 2021

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - February 2021 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 23 Oct 2020

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 23 October 2020 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 30 Jun 2020

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 30 June 2020 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 21 Feb 2020

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 21 February 2020 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 18 Oct 2019

    Public Statement - October 2019 In its October 2019 public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to call on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 21 Jun 2019

    Public Statement - June 2019 In its June 2019 public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to call on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 22 Feb 2019

    Public Statement - February 2019 In its February 2019 public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 19 Oct 2018

    Public Statement - October 2018 In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 29 Jun 2018

    Public Statement In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 23 Feb 2018

    Public Statement In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 23 Feb 2018

    Outcomes FATF Plenary, 21-23 February 2018 Under the Presidency of Mr. Santiago Otamendi of Argentina, delegates discussed among other issues combatting terrorist financing, the assessment of Iceland, Iran's actions to address deficiencies in its AML/CFT system.

  • 4 Nov 2017

    Outcomes Joint FATF/GAFILAT Plenary, 1-3 November 2017 Delegates discussed counter-terrorist financing, financial inclusion, information sharing and measures to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation in Portugal and Mexico. They also discussed the follow-up report for Austria, issued a statement on Brazil, discussed AML/CFT improvements in Uganda and issued a statement on DPRK.

  • 3 Nov 2017

    Public Statement In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 3 Nov 2017

    FATF Statement on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) In order to address the threat posed by the DPRK’s illicit activities related to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction WMD and its financing, the FATF calls upon its members and urges all jurisdictions to effectively implement the relevant FATF recommendations and UNSC Resolutions.

  • 23 Jun 2017

    Public Statement - 23 June 2017 In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 24 Feb 2017

    Public Statement - 24 February 2017 In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 21 Oct 2016

    Public Statement - 21 October 2016 In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 27 Jun 2016

    Outcomes of the Plenary meeting of the FATF, Busan Korea, 22–24 June 2016 Delegates discussed improving transparency and beneficial ownership, and the global response to terrorist financing. The FATF adopted a new Standard for non-profit organisations, issued a statement on Iran and discussed the mutual evaluation reports of Austria, Canada and Singapore. During the list meeting under the Korean Presidency, delegates also heard an update of AML/CFT improvements in Myanmar and Papua New Guinea.

  • 24 Jun 2016

    Public Statement - 24 June 2016 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 19 Feb 2016

    FATF Public Statement – 19 February 2016 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 23 Oct 2015

    FATF Public Statement - 23 October 2015 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF calls on countries to apply counter-measures to Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. FATF also calls its members to consider the risks emanating from Myanmar.

  • 27 Feb 2015

    FATF Public Statement - 27 February 2015 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF calls on countries to apply counter-measures to Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. FATF also calls its members to consider the risks emanating from Algeria, Ecuador and Myanmar.

  • 24 Oct 2014

    Public Statement - 24 October 2014 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti money-laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF calls on countries to apply counter-measures to Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. FATF also calls its members to consider the risks emanating from Algeria, Ecuador, Indonesia and Myanmar.

  • 27 Jun 2014

    FATF Public Statement - 27 June 2014 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in February 2014 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 14 Feb 2014

    FATF Public Statement - 14 February 2014 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in October 2013 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 18 Oct 2013

    FATF Public Statement, 18 October 2013 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in June 2013 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 21 Jun 2013

    FATF Public Statement - 21 June 2013 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in February 2013 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 22 Feb 2013

    FATF Public Statement 22 February 2013 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in October 2012 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 19 Oct 2012

    FATF Public Statement - 19 October 2012 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in June 2012 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 25 Jun 2012

    FATF Public Statement - 22 June 2012 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in February 2012 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 28 Oct 2011

    FATF Public Statement - 28 October 2011 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in June 2011 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 24 Jun 2011

    FATF Public Statement - 24 June 2011 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in February 2011 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 25 Feb 2011

    FATF Public Statement - 25 February 2011 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in October 2010 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 22 Oct 2010

    FATF Public Statement - 22 October 2010 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in June 2010 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 25 Jun 2010

    FATF Public Statement - 25 June 2010 To protect the international financial system from ML/FT risks and to encourage greater compliance with the AML/CFT standards, the FATF identified jurisdictions that have strategic deficiencies and, along with the FATF-style regional bodies FSRBs, works with them to address those deficiencies that pose a risk to the international financial system.

  • 18 Feb 2010

    FATF Public Statement - February 2010 To protect the international financial system from ML/FT risks and to encourage greater compliance with the AML/CFT standards, the FATF identified jurisdictions that have strategic deficiencies and, along with the FATF-style regional bodies FSRBs, works with them to address those deficiencies that pose a risk to the international financial system.

  • 16 Oct 2009

    FATF Statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe - October 2009 Issuing a statement reaffirming its call on members and others jurisdictions for effective counter-measures concerning the risks to the integrity of the international financial system emanating from Iran. The FATF remains concerned about the money laundering and terrorist financing risks emanating from Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe.

  • 26 Jun 2009

    FATF Statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe - 26 June 2009 Issuing a statement reaffirming its call for effective counter-measures concerning the risks to the integrity of the international financial system emanating from Iran. The FATF remains concerned about the money laundering and terrorist financing risks emanating from Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe.

  • 25 Feb 2009

    FATF Statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe - 26 February 2009 The anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT systems of Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tome and Principe were the subject of a statement issued during the FATF XX Plenary, held in Paris.

  • 16 Oct 2008

    FATF Statement - 16 October 2008 During the FATF Plenary XX in Rio de Janeiro, the FATF issued a statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan,Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Principe and the AML/CFT improvements in the northern part of Cyprus.

  • 20 Jun 2008

    FATF Statement - 20 June 2008 The FATF Plenary has reaffirmed its public statement of 28 February 2008 regarding the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism risks posed by Uzbekistan, Iran, Pakistan, Turkmenistan and São Tomé and Principe, and the northern part of Cyprus.

  • 28 Feb 2008

    FATF Statement - 28 February 2008 The FATF is concerned about the lack of comprehensive AML/CFT systems in Uzbekistan, Iran, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, São Tomé and Príncipe and the northern part of Cyprus.

Mutual evaluations

Oman

Last evaluation
2011-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2024-03-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-10-01 00:00

Lesotho

Last evaluation
2011-09-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-09-01 00:00

Kuwait

Last evaluation
2011-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-06-01 00:00

Guinea

Last evaluation
2010-12-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-03-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-11-01 00:00

Liberia

Last evaluation
2011-05-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-09-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-05-01 00:00

Montserrat

Last evaluation
2011-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2024-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-11-01 00:00

India

Last evaluation
2010-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-06-01 00:00

El Salvador

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2023-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-07-01 00:00

Curaçao, Kingdom of the Netherlands

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2024-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-05-01 00:00

Comoros

Last evaluation
2010-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-05-01 00:00

Burundi

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Belize

Last evaluation
2011-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-11-01 00:00

Bolivia

Last evaluation
2006-07-19 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-05-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-12-01 00:00

Brunei Darussalam

Last evaluation
2010-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-07-01 00:00

Angola

Last evaluation
2012-12-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-04-01 00:00

Argentina

Last evaluation
2010-11-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2024-03-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-10-01 00:00

South Sudan

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Timor Leste

Last evaluation
2012-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-10-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-07-01 00:00

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Last evaluation
2010-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-03-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-11-01 00:00

Qatar

Last evaluation
2008-04-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-07-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-02-01 00:00

Sint Maarten, Kingdom of the Netherlands

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2024-09-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-05-01 00:00

Papua New Guinea

Last evaluation
2011-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-09-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-07-01 00:00

Niue

Last evaluation
2012-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2024-10-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-07-01 00:00

Maldives

Last evaluation
2012-01-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2024-10-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-07-01 00:00

Equatorial Guinea

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2023-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-04-01 00:00

Domenica

Last evaluation
2009-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-09-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-05-01 00:00

Guyana

Last evaluation
2011-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-10-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-05-01 00:00

Turkmenistan

Last evaluation
2011-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-06-01 00:00

Rwanda

Last evaluation
2014-09-05 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-04-01 00:00

Gabon

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2022-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-04-01 00:00

Venezuela

Last evaluation
2009-09-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2022-11-01 00:00

Virgin Islands (British)

Last evaluation
2008-12-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-11-01 00:00

Central African Republic

Last evaluation
2010-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-09-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-09-01 00:00

Eritrea

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2023-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-09-01 00:00

Chad

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2022-05-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-04-01 00:00

Nauru

Last evaluation
2012-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-10-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-07-01 00:00

Anguilla

Last evaluation
2010-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-07-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-05-01 00:00

Marshall Islands

Last evaluation
2011-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-10-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-07-01 00:00

Brazil

Last evaluation
2010-06-25 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-03-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-10-01 00:00

Côte d'Ivoire

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2022-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-05-01 00:00

Montenegro

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2023-02-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-12-01 00:00

Jersey

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2023-10-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-05-01 00:00

Palestinian Authority

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2023-02-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-11-01 00:00

Iraq

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2023-07-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-05-01 00:00

Djibouti

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2024-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-11-01 00:00

Sudan

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2023-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-11-01 00:00

Syria

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Libya

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Yemen

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Sao Tome & Principe

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2023-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-05-01 00:00

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2023-10-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-05-01 00:00

Afghanistan

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Guernsey

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-09-01 00:00

North Macedonia

Last evaluation
2008-07-16 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-10-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-05-01 00:00

Indonesia

Last evaluation
2018-11-05 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-07-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-02-01 00:00

Lao People's Democratic Republic

Last evaluation
2011-06-15 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-09-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-07-01 00:00

Kazakhstan

Last evaluation
2011-06-17 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-10-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-06-01 00:00

Romania

Last evaluation
2008-07-08 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-09-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-05-01 00:00

Luxembourg

Last evaluation
2010-02-19 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-11-30 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-06-19 00:00

Lebanon

Last evaluation
2009-11-10 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-09-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-05-01 00:00

Algeria

Last evaluation
2010-12-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-05-01 00:00

Nepal

Last evaluation
2011-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2023-07-01 00:00

Singapore

Last evaluation
2016-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2026-02-01 00:00

Italy

Last evaluation
2015-10-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2026-02-01 00:00

Canada

Last evaluation
2016-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2026-06-01 00:00

Belgium

Last evaluation
2015-02-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-10-01 00:00

Malaysia

Last evaluation
2015-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-10-01 00:00

Austria

Last evaluation
2016-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2026-02-01 00:00

Türkiye

Last evaluation
2019-10-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2026-06-01 00:00

Ratings

Effectiveness

Ratings that reflect the extent to which a country's measures are effective. The assessment is conducted on the basis of 11 immediate outcomes, which represent key goals that an effective AML/CFT system should achieve.

Russian Federation Mutual Evaluation - 2019

IO1
SE
IO2
SE
IO3
ME
IO4
ME
IO5
SE
IO6
HE
IO7
ME
IO8
SE
IO9
HE
IO10
ME
IO11
ME

Technical Compliance

definition

Ratings which reflect the extent to which a country has implemented the technical requirements of the FATF Recommendations.

C = compliant   |   LC = largely compliant     |   PC = partially compliant   |   NC = non-compliant

Russian Federation Mutual Evaluation - 2019

R.1 - Assessing risk & applying risk-based approach
LC
R.2 - National cooperation and coordination
C
R.3 - Money laundering offence
LC
R.4 - Confiscation and provisional measures
LC
R.5 - Terrorist financing offence
LC
R.6 - Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism & terrorist financing
PC
R.7 - Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation
PC
R.8 - Non-profit organisations
LC
R.9 - Financial institution secrecy laws
C
R.10 - Customer due diligence
LC
R.11 - Record keeping
LC
R.12 - Politically exposed persons
PC
R.13 - Correspondent banking
LC
R.14 - Money or value transfer services
LC
R.15 - New technologies
C
R.16 - Wire transfers
PC
R.17 - Reliance on third parties
LC
R.18 - Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries
LC
R.19 - Higher-risk countries
LC
R.20 - Reporting of suspicious transactions
C
R.21 - Tipping-off and confidentiality
LC
R.22 - DNFBPs: Customer due diligence
LC
R.23 - DNFBPs: Other measures
LC
R.24 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons
LC
R.25 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements
PC
R.26 - Regulation and supervision of financial institutions
LC
R.27 - Powers of supervisors
LC
R.28 - Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs
LC
R.29 - Financial intelligence units
C
R.30 - Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities
LC
R.31 - Powers of law enforcement and investigative authorities
C
R.32 - Cash couriers
LC
R.33 - Statistics
C
R.34 - Guidance and feedback
LC
R.35- Sanctions
LC
R.36 - International instruments
LC
R.37 - Mutual legal assistance
LC
R.38 - Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation
LC
R.39 - Extradition
LC
R.40 - Other forms of international cooperation
LC