Democratic People's Republic of Korea

Related publications

  • 23 Feb 2024

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - February 2024 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from the country..

  • 27 Oct 2023

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - October 2023 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from the country..

  • 23 Jun 2023

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - June 2023 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from the country..

  • 24 Feb 2023

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 24 February 2023 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 21 Oct 2022

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 21 October 2022 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 17 Jun 2022

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - June 2022 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 3 Mar 2022

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - March 2022 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 21 Oct 2021

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - October 2021 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF risks emanating from the country.

  • 25 Jun 2021

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - June 2021 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 25 Feb 2021

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - February 2021 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 23 Oct 2020

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 23 October 2020 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 30 Jun 2020

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 30 June 2020 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 21 Feb 2020

    High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action – 21 February 2020 High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money laundering, terrorist financing, and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply counter-measures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks emanating from the country.

  • 18 Oct 2019

    Public Statement - October 2019 In its October 2019 public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to call on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 21 Jun 2019

    Public Statement - June 2019 In its June 2019 public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to call on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 22 Feb 2019

    Public Statement - February 2019 In its February 2019 public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 19 Oct 2018

    Public Statement - October 2018 In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 29 Jun 2018

    Public Statement In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 23 Feb 2018

    Public Statement In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 23 Feb 2018

    Outcomes FATF Plenary, 21-23 February 2018 Under the Presidency of Mr. Santiago Otamendi of Argentina, delegates discussed among other issues combatting terrorist financing, the assessment of Iceland, Iran's actions to address deficiencies in its AML/CFT system.

  • 4 Nov 2017

    Outcomes Joint FATF/GAFILAT Plenary, 1-3 November 2017 Delegates discussed counter-terrorist financing, financial inclusion, information sharing and measures to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation in Portugal and Mexico. They also discussed the follow-up report for Austria, issued a statement on Brazil, discussed AML/CFT improvements in Uganda and issued a statement on DPRK.

  • 3 Nov 2017

    Public Statement In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 3 Nov 2017

    FATF Statement on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) In order to address the threat posed by the DPRK’s illicit activities related to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction WMD and its financing, the FATF calls upon its members and urges all jurisdictions to effectively implement the relevant FATF recommendations and UNSC Resolutions.

  • 23 Jun 2017

    Public Statement - 23 June 2017 In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 24 Feb 2017

    Public Statement - 24 February 2017 In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 21 Oct 2016

    Public Statement - 21 October 2016 In its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures, the FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 27 Jun 2016

    Outcomes of the Plenary meeting of the FATF, Busan Korea, 22–24 June 2016 Delegates discussed improving transparency and beneficial ownership, and the global response to terrorist financing. The FATF adopted a new Standard for non-profit organisations, issued a statement on Iran and discussed the mutual evaluation reports of Austria, Canada and Singapore. During the list meeting under the Korean Presidency, delegates also heard an update of AML/CFT improvements in Myanmar and Papua New Guinea.

  • 24 Jun 2016

    Public Statement - 24 June 2016 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 19 Feb 2016

    FATF Public Statement – 19 February 2016 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF continues to calls on countries to apply counter-measures to Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

  • 23 Oct 2015

    FATF Public Statement - 23 October 2015 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF calls on countries to apply counter-measures to Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. FATF also calls its members to consider the risks emanating from Myanmar.

  • 27 Feb 2015

    FATF Public Statement - 27 February 2015 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF calls on countries to apply counter-measures to Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. FATF also calls its members to consider the risks emanating from Algeria, Ecuador and Myanmar.

  • 24 Oct 2014

    Public Statement - 24 October 2014 The FATF has updated its public statement identifying jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in anti money-laundering / countering the financing of terrorism measures. FATF calls on countries to apply counter-measures to Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. FATF also calls its members to consider the risks emanating from Algeria, Ecuador, Indonesia and Myanmar.

  • 27 Jun 2014

    FATF Public Statement - 27 June 2014 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in February 2014 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 14 Feb 2014

    FATF Public Statement - 14 February 2014 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in October 2013 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 18 Oct 2013

    FATF Public Statement, 18 October 2013 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in June 2013 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 21 Jun 2013

    FATF Public Statement - 21 June 2013 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in February 2013 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 22 Feb 2013

    FATF Public Statement 22 February 2013 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in October 2012 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 19 Oct 2012

    FATF Public Statement - 19 October 2012 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in June 2012 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 25 Jun 2012

    FATF Public Statement - 22 June 2012 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in February 2012 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 28 Oct 2011

    FATF Public Statement - 28 October 2011 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in June 2011 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 24 Jun 2011

    FATF Public Statement - 24 June 2011 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in February 2011 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 25 Feb 2011

    FATF Public Statement - 25 February 2011 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in October 2010 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 22 Oct 2010

    FATF Public Statement - 22 October 2010 The FATF has updated its public statement issued in June 2010 which identifies jurisdictions with strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT deficiencies.

  • 25 Jun 2010

    FATF Public Statement - 25 June 2010 To protect the international financial system from ML/FT risks and to encourage greater compliance with the AML/CFT standards, the FATF identified jurisdictions that have strategic deficiencies and, along with the FATF-style regional bodies FSRBs, works with them to address those deficiencies that pose a risk to the international financial system.

  • 18 Feb 2010

    FATF Public Statement - February 2010 To protect the international financial system from ML/FT risks and to encourage greater compliance with the AML/CFT standards, the FATF identified jurisdictions that have strategic deficiencies and, along with the FATF-style regional bodies FSRBs, works with them to address those deficiencies that pose a risk to the international financial system.

  • 16 Oct 2009

    FATF Statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe - October 2009 Issuing a statement reaffirming its call on members and others jurisdictions for effective counter-measures concerning the risks to the integrity of the international financial system emanating from Iran. The FATF remains concerned about the money laundering and terrorist financing risks emanating from Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe.

  • 26 Jun 2009

    FATF Statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe - 26 June 2009 Issuing a statement reaffirming its call for effective counter-measures concerning the risks to the integrity of the international financial system emanating from Iran. The FATF remains concerned about the money laundering and terrorist financing risks emanating from Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe.

  • 25 Feb 2009

    FATF Statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Príncipe - 26 February 2009 The anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT systems of Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tome and Principe were the subject of a statement issued during the FATF XX Plenary, held in Paris.

  • 16 Oct 2008

    FATF Statement - 16 October 2008 During the FATF Plenary XX in Rio de Janeiro, the FATF issued a statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan,Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Principe and the AML/CFT improvements in the northern part of Cyprus.

  • 16 Oct 2008

    FATF Statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan, São Tomé and Príncipe and the Northern Part of Cyprus - 16 October 2008 During the FATF Plenary XX in Rio de Janeiro, the FATF issued a statement concerning Iran, Uzbekistan,Turkmenistan, Pakistan and São Tomé and Principe and the AML/CFT improvements in the northern part of Cyprus.

  • 20 Jun 2008

    FATF Statement - 20 June 2008 The FATF Plenary has reaffirmed its public statement of 28 February 2008 regarding the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism risks posed by Uzbekistan, Iran, Pakistan, Turkmenistan and São Tomé and Principe, and the northern part of Cyprus.

  • 28 Feb 2008

    FATF Statement - 28 February 2008 The FATF is concerned about the lack of comprehensive AML/CFT systems in Uzbekistan, Iran, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, São Tomé and Príncipe and the northern part of Cyprus.

Mutual evaluations

Zimbabwe

Last evaluation
2022-08-25 00:00
Possible onsite period
2027-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2027-08-01 00:00

Ethiopia

Last evaluation
2022-08-25 00:00
Possible onsite period
2026-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2027-03-01 00:00

Eritrea

missOrigin

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2031-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2031-08-01 00:00

Uganda

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2028-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2029-03-01 00:00

El Salvador

Last evaluation
2010-01-05 00:00
Possible onsite period
2024-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-07-01 00:00

Niue

Last evaluation
2012-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2024-10-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-07-01 00:00

Maldives

Last evaluation
2011-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2024-10-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-07-01 00:00

Spain

missOrigin

Last evaluation
2019-12-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2027-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2027-10-01 00:00

South Sudan

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Tanzania

Last evaluation
2023-01-30 00:00
Possible onsite period
2030-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2030-08-01 00:00

Timor Leste

Last evaluation
2012-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-07-01 00:00

Equatorial Guinea

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2024-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-10-01 00:00

Iceland

Last evaluation
2018-04-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2026-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2027-02-01 00:00

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Last evaluation
2009-01-12 00:00
Possible onsite period
2024-02-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-12-01 00:00

South Sudan

missOrigin

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2029-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2029-08-01 00:00

Finland

Last evaluation
2019-04-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2027-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2028-06-01 00:00

Mozambique

Last evaluation
2021-07-13 00:00
Possible onsite period
2030-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2031-03-01 00:00

Guyana

Last evaluation
2011-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-09-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-05-01 00:00

Mexico

Last evaluation
2018-01-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2026-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2026-10-01 00:00

Saudi-Arabia

Last evaluation
2018-09-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2026-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2027-06-01 00:00

Indonesia

Last evaluation
2023-04-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2029-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2030-06-01 00:00

Singapore

Last evaluation
2016-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2026-02-01 00:00

Jersey

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2023-10-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-05-01 00:00

Italy

Last evaluation
2015-10-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2026-02-01 00:00

Madagascar

Last evaluation
2023-06-05 00:00
Possible onsite period
2026-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2027-03-01 00:00

Australia

Last evaluation
2015-04-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2026-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2027-06-01 00:00

Palestinian Authority

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Canada

Last evaluation
2016-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2026-06-01 00:00

Iraq

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2023-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-05-01 00:00

Rwanda

missOrigin

Last evaluation
2014-09-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-04-01 00:00

New Zealand

Last evaluation
2021-04-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2029-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2029-10-01 00:00

Qatar

Last evaluation
2023-05-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2029-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2030-02-01 00:00

Zambia

Last evaluation
2022-08-25 00:00
Possible onsite period
2028-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2029-03-01 00:00

Guernsey

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2024-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-12-01 00:00

Belgium

Last evaluation
2015-02-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-10-01 00:00

Oman

Last evaluation
2011-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2024-02-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-10-01 00:00

Namibia

Last evaluation
2023-01-27 00:00
Possible onsite period
2031-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2031-08-01 00:00

Lesotho

Last evaluation
2011-09-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2029-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2030-03-01 00:00

Denmark

Last evaluation
2017-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2027-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2028-02-01 00:00

China

Last evaluation
2019-04-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2026-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2027-02-01 00:00

Malawi

Last evaluation
2019-11-03 00:00
Possible onsite period
2029-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2029-08-01 00:00

Kuwait

Last evaluation
2011-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-06-01 00:00

Bahrain

Last evaluation
2018-09-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2026-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2027-06-01 00:00

United Arab Emirates

Last evaluation
2020-04-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2026-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2027-02-01 00:00

Russian Federation

Last evaluation
2019-12-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2028-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2029-02-01 00:00

Venezuela

Last evaluation
2009-09-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2022-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2022-11-01 00:00

Germany

Last evaluation
2022-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2029-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2029-10-01 00:00

Curaçao, Kingdom of the Netherlands

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2024-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-05-01 00:00

Somalia

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2024-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-05-01 00:00

Kenya

Last evaluation
2023-01-27 00:00
Possible onsite period
2031-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2032-03-01 00:00

Mauritius

Last evaluation
2023-01-31 00:00
Possible onsite period
2028-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2028-08-01 00:00

Syria

Last evaluation
2006-11-12 00:00
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

South Africa

Last evaluation
2021-10-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2027-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2027-10-01 00:00

Sint Maarten, Kingdom of the Netherlands

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2024-09-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-05-01 00:00

Eritrea

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2024-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-04-01 00:00

Comoros

Last evaluation
2010-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-07-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-05-01 00:00

Afghanistan

Last evaluation
2011-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Greece

Last evaluation
2019-09-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2029-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2030-02-01 00:00

Botswana

Last evaluation
2023-01-31 00:00
Possible onsite period
2027-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2028-03-01 00:00

Libya

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Sao Tome & Principe

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2024-02-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-11-01 00:00

France

Last evaluation
2022-05-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2029-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2030-02-01 00:00

Israel

Last evaluation
2018-12-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2028-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2029-06-01 00:00

Papua New Guinea

Last evaluation
2011-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-07-01 00:00

Nauru

Last evaluation
2012-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-07-01 00:00

Belize

Last evaluation
2011-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-11-01 00:00

United States

Last evaluation
2016-11-30 00:00
Possible onsite period
2026-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2026-10-01 00:00

Switzerland

Last evaluation
2016-12-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2027-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2028-02-01 00:00

Portugal

Last evaluation
2017-12-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2028-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2029-02-01 00:00

Djibouti

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2024-02-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-11-01 00:00

Norway

Last evaluation
2014-12-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2028-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2028-10-01 00:00

Montserrat

Last evaluation
2011-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2024-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-11-01 00:00

United Kingdom

Last evaluation
2022-05-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2027-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2028-02-01 00:00

Argentina

Last evaluation
2010-11-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2024-03-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-10-01 00:00

Türkiye

Last evaluation
2019-10-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2026-06-01 00:00

Sweden

Last evaluation
2017-04-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2027-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2028-06-01 00:00

Malaysia

Last evaluation
2015-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2025-10-01 00:00

India

Last evaluation
2010-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-06-01 00:00

Anguilla

Last evaluation
2010-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-07-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-05-01 00:00

Eswatini

Last evaluation
2022-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2030-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2030-08-01 00:00

Ireland

Last evaluation
2017-09-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2028-04-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2028-10-01 00:00

Seychelles

Last evaluation
2023-06-05 00:00
Possible onsite period
2027-06-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2028-03-01 00:00

Hong Kong, China

Last evaluation
2019-09-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2029-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2030-06-01 00:00

Austria

Last evaluation
2016-06-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2025-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2026-02-01 00:00

Marshall Islands

Last evaluation
2011-07-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2023-11-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2024-07-01 00:00

Republic of Korea

Last evaluation
2020-04-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2028-12-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2029-06-01 00:00

Japan

Last evaluation
2021-08-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
2028-08-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2029-02-01 00:00

Burundi

Last evaluation
Possible onsite period
2026-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2026-08-01 00:00

Yemen

Last evaluation
2009-04-01 00:00
Possible onsite period
Possible Plenary discussion

Angola

Last evaluation
2023-06-19 00:00
Possible onsite period
2032-01-01 00:00
Possible Plenary discussion
2032-08-01 00:00

Ratings

Effectiveness

Ratings that reflect the extent to which a country's measures are effective. The assessment is conducted on the basis of 11 immediate outcomes, which represent key goals that an effective AML/CFT system should achieve.

Benin Follow-Up Report 2023

IO1
LE
IO2
LE
IO3
LE
IO4
LE
IO5
LE
IO6
LE
IO7
LE
IO8
LE
IO9
LE
IO10
LE
IO11
LE

Technical Compliance

Definition

Ratings which reflect the extent to which a country has implemented the technical requirements of the FATF Recommendations.

C = compliant   |   LC = largely compliant     |   PC = partially compliant   |   NC = non-compliant

Benin Follow-Up Report 2023

R.1 - Assessing risk & applying risk-based approach
LC
R.2 - National cooperation and coordination
LC
R.3 - Money laundering offence
LC
R.4 - Confiscation and provisional measures
PC
R.5 - Terrorist financing offence
PC
R.6 - Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism & terrorist financing
LC
R.7 - Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation
LC
R.8 - Non-profit organisations
NC
R.9 - Financial institution secrecy laws
C
R.10 - Customer due diligence
PC
R.11 - Record keeping
LC
R.12 - Politically exposed persons
PC
R.13 - Correspondent banking
LC
R.14 - Money or value transfer services
PC
R.15 - New technologies
NC
R.16 - Wire transfers
PC
R.17 - Reliance on third parties
LC
R.18 - Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries
LC
R.19 - Higher-risk countries
NC
R.20 - Reporting of suspicious transactions
PC
R.21 - Tipping-off and confidentiality
C
R.22 - DNFBPs: Customer due diligence
PC
R.23 - DNFBPs: Other measures
PC
R.24 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons
NC
R.25 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements
NC
R.26 - Regulation and supervision of financial institutions
PC
R.27 - Powers of supervisors
C
R.28 - Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs
NC
R.29 - Financial intelligence units
C
R.30 - Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities
C
R.31 - Powers of law enforcement and investigative authorities
C
R.32 - Cash couriers
PC
R.33 - Statistics
LC
R.34 - Guidance and feedback
PC
R.35- Sanctions
LC
R.36 - International instruments
LC
R.37 - Mutual legal assistance
C
R.38 - Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation
LC
R.39 - Extradition
LC
R.40 - Other forms of international cooperation
LC