Nouvelle Zélande

Membre depuis 1991

Les progrès de la Nouvelle Zélande dans le renforcement des mesures de lutte contre le blanchiment d’argent et le financement du terrorisme

31 mai 2022

Ce rapport de suivi analyse les progrès réalisés par la Nouvelle-Zélande pour remédier aux lacunes en matière de conformité technique identifiées dans son évaluation mutuelle de 2021.

Disponible en anglais uniquement. 

Les mesures de lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme de la Nouvelle Zélande

29 avr. 2021

Les mesures prises par la Nouvelle-Zélande pour lutter contre le blanchiment d'argent et le financement du terrorisme donnent de bons résultats, mais le pays doit se concentrer davantage sur l'amélioration de la disponibilité des informations sur les bénéficiaires effectifs, le renforcement de la supervision et la mise en œuvre de sanctions financières ciblées.

Disponible en anglais uniquement.

Mutual Evaluation of Australia-2015

Notations

Conformité technique

Des notations qui reflètent la mesure dans laquelle un pays a mis en œuvre les exigences techniques des recommandations du GAFI.

Nouvelle Zélande - Rapport de suivi - 2022

R.1 - Assessing risk & applying risk-based approach
LC
R.2 - National cooperation and coordination
C
R.3 - Money laundering offence
C
R.4 - Confiscation and provisional measures
C
R.5 - Terrorist financing offence
LC
R.6 - Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism & terrorist financing
LC
R.7 - Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation
PC
R.8 - Non-profit organisations
LC
R.9 - Financial institution secrecy laws
C
R.10 - Customer due diligence
LC
R.11 - Record keeping
LC
R.12 - Politically exposed persons
PC
R.13 - Correspondent banking
LC
R.14 - Money or value transfer services
PC
R.15 - New technologies
LC
R.16 - Wire transfers
PC
R.17 - Reliance on third parties
LC
R.18 - Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries
PC
R.19 - Higher-risk countries
PC
R.20 - Reporting of suspicious transactions
C
R.21 - Tipping-off and confidentiality
C
R.22 - DNFBPs: Customer due diligence
PC
R.23 - DNFBPs: Other measures
PC
R.24 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons
PC
R.25 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements
LC
R.26 - Regulation and supervision of financial institutions
PC
R.27 - Powers of supervisors
LC
R.28 - Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs
PC
R.29 - Financial intelligence units
C
R.30 - Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities
C
R.31 - Powers of law enforcement and investigative authorities
LC
R.32 - Cash couriers
LC
R.33 - Statistics
LC
R.34 - Guidance and feedback
LC
R.35- Sanctions
LC
R.36 - International instruments
LC
R.37 - Mutual legal assistance
LC
R.38 - Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation
LC
R.39 - Extradition
LC
R.40 - Other forms of international cooperation
LC

C = conforme (compliant )  |   LC =  en grande partie conforme (largely compliant)     |   PC = partiellement conforme (partially compliant)   |   NC = non conforme (non-compliant)

Efficacité

Ratings that reflect the extent to which a country's measures are effective. The assessment is conducted on the basis of 11 immediate outcomes, which represent key goals that an effective AML/CFT system should achieve.

Des notations qui reflètent le degré d'efficacité des mises en oeuvre par un pays. L'évaluation est menée sur la base de 11 résultats immédiats, qui représentent les objectifs clés qu'un système efficace de LBC/FT devrait atteindre.

Nouvelle Zélande - Évaluation mutuelle - 2021

IO1
SE
IO2
HE
IO3
ME
IO4
ME
IO5
ME
IO6
SE
IO7
SE
IO8
HE
IO9
SE
IO10
ME
IO11
ME

HE = niveau d'efficacité élevé (high level of effectiveness)   |   SE = niveau d'efficacité significatif (significant level of effectiveness)   |   ME = niveau d'efficacité modéré (moderate level of effectiveness)   |   LE = niveau d'efficacité faible (low level of effectiveness)

 

Publications connexes 

  • 31 mai 2022

    New Zealand's progress in strengthening measures to tackle money laundering and terrorist financing This follow-up report analyses New Zealand's progress in addressing the technical compliance deficiencies identified in its 2021 Mutual Evaluation.
  • 29 avr. 2021

    New Zealand's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing New Zealand’s measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing are delivering good results, but the country needs to focus more on improving the availability of beneficial ownership information, strengthening supervision and implementation of targeted financial sanctions.
  • 21 oct. 2013

    Mutual Evaluation of New Zealand: 2nd Follow-up Report This follow-up report provides an overview of the main changes made to the AML/CFT system in New Zealand since the adoption of its mutual evaluation report in October 2009. In October 2013, the FATF recognised that New Zealand had made significant progress in addressing deficiencies identified in its mutual evaluation report and decided that the country should be removed from the regular follow-up process.
  • 16 oct. 2009

    Mutual Evaluation of New Zealand New Zealand, which is a member of both the FATF and the Asia-Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG), has recently completed an extensive review of its AML/CFT regime, and the legal framework that underpins it. The following key findings highlight the progress that has been made by New Zealand since its last mutual evaluation in 2003.

Principal(e) Ministère/Autorité représenté(e) au sein de la Délegation auprès du GAFI

Head of delegation

Autres Ministères / Autorités

Aussi membre de