Pays Bas

Membre depuis 1990

En 2022, le GAFI a évalué l'efficacité des mesures prises par les Pays-Bas pour lutter contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme, ainsi que leur conformité aux recommandations du GAFI. 

Le rapport a conclu que les Pays-Bas ont apporté des améliorations notables à leur cadre de lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux (LBC) et le financement du terrorisme (CFT) au cours des dernières années. La conformité technique aux normes du GAFI est forte, bien qu'il y ait quelques lacunes en suspens, notamment en ce qui concerne la réglementation des fournisseurs de services d'actifs virtuels.

L'un des principaux atouts du système néerlandais de lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme réside dans son solide système de coopération et de coordination nationales, tant au niveau des politiques que des opérations. D'autres aspects forts du régime incluent l'utilisation des données dans les enquêtes et dans le développement du renseignement financier. Les Pays-Bas font de la confiscation des avoirs criminels une priorité stratégique et s'engagent également de manière proactive auprès du secteur à but non lucratif afin d'éviter leur utilisation abusive pour le financement du terrorisme. Cependant, diverses améliorations doivent être apportées pour empêcher que les personnes morales soient utilisées à des fins criminelles et pour garantir l'accès à des informations adéquates, précises et actuelles sur les bénéficiaires effectifs. D'autres améliorations consistent à renforcer la surveillance fondée sur le risque et à allouer des ressources adéquates à la lutte contre les activités non autorisées.

Un rapport de suivi a été publié en 2025.

Notations

Conformité technique

Des notations qui reflètent la mesure dans laquelle un pays a mis en œuvre les exigences techniques des recommandations du GAFI.

Netherlands - Follow-Up Report 2025

R.1 - Assessing risk & applying risk-based approach
LC
R.2 - National cooperation and coordination
C
R.3 - Money laundering offence
LC
R.4 - Confiscation and provisional measures
C
R.5 - Terrorist financing offence
LC
R.6 - Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism & terrorist financing
LC
R.7 - Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation
LC
R.8 - Non-profit organisations
LC
R.9 - Financial institution secrecy laws
C
R.10 - Customer due diligence
LC
R.11 - Record keeping
C
R.12 - Politically exposed persons
LC
R.13 - Correspondent banking
PC
R.14 - Money or value transfer services
C
R.15 - New technologies
LC
R.16 - Wire transfers
LC
R.17 - Reliance on third parties
LC
R.18 - Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries
LC
R.19 - Higher-risk countries
LC
R.20 - Reporting of suspicious transactions
C
R.21 - Tipping-off and confidentiality
LC
R.22 - DNFBPs: Customer due diligence
LC
R.23 - DNFBPs: Other measures
LC
R.24 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons
LC
R.25 - Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements
LC
R.26 - Regulation and supervision of financial institutions
LC
R.27 - Powers of supervisors
C
R.28 - Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs
LC
R.29 - Financial intelligence units
C
R.30 - Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities
C
R.31 - Powers of law enforcement and investigative authorities
LC
R.32 - Cash couriers
LC
R.33 - Statistics
LC
R.34 - Guidance and feedback
LC
R.35- Sanctions
LC
R.36 - International instruments
LC
R.37 - Mutual legal assistance
C
R.38 - Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation
LC
R.39 - Extradition
LC
R.40 - Other forms of international cooperation
LC

C = conforme (compliant )  |   LC =  en grande partie conforme (largely compliant)     |   PC = partiellement conforme (partially compliant)   |   NC = non conforme (non-compliant)

Efficacité

Ratings that reflect the extent to which a country's measures are effective. The assessment is conducted on the basis of 11 immediate outcomes, which represent key goals that an effective AML/CFT system should achieve.

Des notations qui reflètent le degré d'efficacité des mises en oeuvre par un pays. L'évaluation est menée sur la base de 11 résultats immédiats, qui représentent les objectifs clés qu'un système efficace de LBC/FT devrait atteindre.

Pays-Bas - Évaluation mutuelle 2022

IO1
SE
IO2
HE
IO3
ME
IO4
ME
IO5
ME
IO6
HE
IO7
SE
IO8
SE
IO9
SE
IO10
SE
IO11
ME

HE = niveau d'efficacité élevé (high level of effectiveness)   |   SE = niveau d'efficacité significatif (significant level of effectiveness)   |   ME = niveau d'efficacité modéré (moderate level of effectiveness)   |   LE = niveau d'efficacité faible (low level of effectiveness)

 

Publications connexes

  • 23 sept. 2025

    The Netherlands' progress in strengthening measures to tackle money laundering and terrorist financing Since the 2022 assessment of the Netherlands' measures to tackle money laundering and terrorist financing, the country has taken a number of actions to strengthen its framework.

  • 24 août 2022

    The Netherlands' measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing The Netherlands’ measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing are delivering good results, but the country needs to do more to prevent legal persons from being used for criminal purposes, strengthen risk-based supervision, and ensure sanctions for money laundering and terrorist financing offences are proportionate and dissuasive.

  • 14 févr. 2014

    Outcomes from the meeting of the FATF Plenary, Paris 12-14 February 2014 The FATF Plenary updated its statements identifying high-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions. The Plenary adopted the follow-up reports to the mutual evaluations of Aruba Kingdom of the Netherlands, Austria, Canada, Luxembourg, Mexico and the Netherlands and reviewed the voluntary tax compliance programmes in several jurisdictions.

  • 14 févr. 2014

    Mutual Evaluation of the Netherlands: 2nd Follow-up Report This follow-up report provides an overview of the main changes made to the AML/CFT system in the Netherlands since the adoption of its mutual evaluation report in February 2011. In February 2014, the FATF recognised that the Netherlands had made significant progress in addressing deficiencies identified in its mutual evaluation report and decided that the country should be removed from the regular follow-up process.

  • 25 juin 2011

    Outcomes of the FATF Plenary meeting, Amsterdam, 23-25 June 2010 The Chairman's summary provides an overview of the major outcomes of the Plenary, during which India became a full member of the FATF and the mutual evaluations of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, India and Brazil were approved.

  • 25 févr. 2011

    Outcomes of the FATF Plenary meeting, Paris, 23-25 February 2011 The Chairman's summary provides an overview of the major outcomes of the meeting of the FATF Plenary, during which the mutual evaluations of France and the Netherlands were approved.

  • 25 févr. 2011

    Mutual Evaluation Report of the Netherlands The FATF has completed and adopted the third mutual evaluation of the AML/CFT system in the Netherlands. The AML/CFT system of the Netherlands is largely in line with the FATF requirements but some shortcomings in the legal framework and the implementation of already existing measures need to be addressed. The evaluation was conducted by the International Monetary Fund and adopted by the FATF.

  • 22 oct. 2010

    Outcomes of the FATF Plenary meeting, Paris, 20-22 October 2010 The Chairman's summary provides an overview of the major outcomes of the meeting of the FATF Plenary, during which the mutual evaluation of Argentina was approved, as well as follow-up reports of the Kingdom of Denmark, Spain and Sweden. The FATF Plenary also provided an update on AML/CFT improvements in Qatar and Azerbaijan

  • 3 juil. 1995

    FATF Annual Report 1994-1995 The sixth FATF Plenary year was chaired by the Netherlands. During this Plenary year, the FATF completed the first round of mutual evaluations of the anti-money laundering measures taken by its members.
Chef de la délégation

Principal(e) Ministère/Autorité représenté(e) au sein de la Délegation auprès du GAFI

Ministry of Finance

 

Co-operating and Supporting Nations (COSUNs) of